Modernism vs Post-Modernism

Form Follows Function is a term that many designers have come or will come across with over the years. The concept behind it is related to design in the 20^th century. It means that the shape of an object should only be based on the initial idea of why the object was created and its intended function and motive. A perfect example of this is ‘Table Lamp’ by Wilhelm Wagenfield and ‘Super Lamp’ by Martine Bedin. To begin with, ‘Table Lamp’ shown below is a beautifully designed household object that sticks to every bit and meaning of form follows function. Its design is simple and fulfills its purpose of lighting up a room. On the other hand, we have ‘Super Lamp’ which in a way also manages to light up a room but is more decorative and a complete opposite to what we mentioned before. ‘Super Lamp’ could very well be seen as a reproduction in a Post-Modernism way of ‘Table Lamp’, which suggests a Modernist approach to its design. Nevertheless, they both function in the way they were made although one may be more adequate than the other for a certain ambient. This comparison makes it easier for one to understand the difference between Modernism and Post-Modernism. Modernism consists of producing, simplification, purpose and originality where on the other hand, Post-Modernism is all about reproduction, ornamentation, play and the mimicking of things that have already been created but in another form.

Wilhelm Wagenfield - Table Lamp, 1924

Martine Bedin - Super Lamp, 1980s